Skip to content

Free public utility · No paywall · Sources cited

Analytics privacy compliance,
mapped across 36 countries and 16 laws.

A reference site for cookies, consent, and analytics rules.
Click a country, read a law, copy a template. All sourced. All free.

36 countries · 16 laws · 8 topics · 15 templates · 27 vendors · 720 verdicts

Map

Start with where you operate

Full map + filters →

Color-coded by enforcement intensity. Click any dot to open the country page — applicable laws, regulator, recent fines, vendor verdicts.

Browse · 36 jurisdictions

Browse by country

See all 36 →

Reference · 16 laws

Browse by law

See all 16 →
EU REGULATION · 2018-05-25
GDPR
EU Regulation 2016/679. Applies in 27 EU member states + 3 EEA states. Effective since 25 May 2018. Maximum fine: €20M or…
20 jurisdictions · max €20.0M
US STATE · 2020-01-01
CCPA/CPRA
California state law. Applies to businesses with revenue ≥$25M OR 100k+ CA consumers OR ≥50% revenue from selling personal data. CPRA added…
1 jurisdictions
NATIONAL · 2021-01-01
UK GDPR
Post-Brexit UK clone of EU GDPR with minor divergences. Enforced by ICO. UK Data Protection and Digital Information Bill amendments pending.
1 jurisdictions · max €20.0M
NATIONAL · 2020-09-18
LGPD
Brazilian federal privacy law modeled after GDPR. Enforced by ANPD. Maximum fine: 2% of Brazilian revenue, capped at R$50M per infraction.
1 jurisdictions
EU DIRECTIVE · 2002-07-31
ePrivacy
EU Directive on cookies, terminal-device access, electronic communications privacy. Implemented nationally — TTDSG (DE), CNIL guidelines (FR), PECR (UK). Article 5(3) is…
20 jurisdictions
NATIONAL · 2001-01-01
PIPEDA
Canadian federal privacy law for commercial sector. Provinces with substantially similar laws (Quebec, Alberta, BC) take precedence. Enforced by OPC.
1 jurisdictions
NATIONAL · 2023-08-11
DPDPA
Indian federal privacy law (rules pending notification). Establishes Data Protection Board. Maximum penalty: ₹250 crore (~€28M) per default. Opt-in consent baseline; carve-outs…
1 jurisdictions
US STATE · 2023-01-01
VCDPA
Virginia state privacy law. Applies to controllers processing data of ≥100k VA consumers OR ≥25k consumers + 50% revenue from sale. Opt-out…
1 jurisdictions

Solve a problem

Browse by topic

All 8 →

Eight topics that come up in almost every analytics setup. Each page is jurisdiction-aware and links to the source rule.

Free for any use

Templates you can copy

All 15 →

Plain-language banners, modular policies, DSR replies, Consent Mode init snippets, DPIA skeletons. Annotated with the rule each one satisfies.

Compare

Side by side, two or three at a time

Same rows on each side. Outliers highlighted. No editorial verdict — just the rules next to each other.

FAQ

Common questions

Is this site free?
Yes. Free forever. No paywalls, no ads, no email gate, no Pro tier. Funded by the operator as a contribution to the field.
Is Google Analytics legal in the EU?
Conditionally. With Consent Mode v2, IP anonymization, a signed DPA, and a reject-all banner, GA4 sits in the yellow zone in most EU member states. A server-side EU proxy moves it to green. Always pair with a Google-certified CMP for ad serving.
Do I need a cookie banner in California?
No mandatory banner under CCPA/CPRA. You need a clear "Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information" link, recognition of the Global Privacy Control signal, and a privacy notice at point of collection.
What is the difference between GDPR and CCPA?
GDPR is opt-in for non-essential cookies and applies to any organization processing data of EU residents. CCPA is opt-out for sale and sharing, applies to California consumers, and has a much narrower applicability threshold.
What is Consent Mode v2?
A JavaScript layer between Google tags and the browser that adjusts data collection by consent state. Required for Google Ads serving to EEA, UK, and Switzerland traffic since March 2024. It is not a CMP and does not by itself satisfy ePrivacy consent rules.
Where does this data come from?
Primary regulator sources — statutes, supervisory-authority guidance, and published decisions. Each entry is reviewed quarterly with a visible last_reviewed timestamp. Methodology is published openly. No affiliates, no sponsorships, no conflicts of interest.

Methodology

Why this is credible

Every entry cites the primary regulator source — the statute, the supervisory authority's guidance, or the published decision. The catalog is reviewed quarterly and every page carries a visible last_reviewed date.

No ads. No affiliates. No sponsored placements. No vendor pays to appear or to change a verdict. The conflicts-of-interest policy is one sentence long because there are no conflicts to disclose.

This is editorial research, not legal advice. For binding interpretation in your jurisdiction, consult a qualified DPO or attorney admitted there.

Read the full methodology →